Press Release August 2010
ACSI: Detroit Tops Auto Industry for the First Time Ever
Ford and General Motors Claim Top Two Spots Amid Weakening Customer Satisfaction; Domestic Autos Overtake Japan and Korea for the First Time in a Decade
ANN ARBOR, Mich. (August 17, 2010)—Customer satisfaction with domestic automobiles has shown resilience despite an overall decline for the industry, according to a report released today by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Automobile satisfaction dips 2.4% from an all-time industry high to a score of 82 on ACSI’s 0-100 scale, but Ford and General Motors are holding steady and their Lincoln- Mercury and Buick nameplates take the lead for the first time ever. Chrysler, however, continues to underperform, with two of its three divisions at the bottom.
“It was not long ago when Detroit’s products were clustered at the bottom of the industry. Although very few automakers improved this year, the domestic ones are either steady or have lost less in customer satisfaction compared to international competition,” said Claes Fornell, founder of the ACSI and author of The Satisfied Customer: Winners and Losers in the Battle for Buyer Preference. “In this sense, the near future looks good for Ford and General Motors. Satisfied customers tend to do more repeat business, generate good word-of-mouth and don’t require greater price incentives to come back.”
Even though satisfaction with most domestic and foreign automakers declines in 2010, U.S. brands show the smallest drop, while Japanese and Korean brands fall the most, putting the U.S. slightly ahead of the Japanese and Koreans for the first time since 2000, although both continue to trail European automakers.
The news for the U.S. economy as a whole is not as positive. The national ACSI is unchanged from the first quarter of 2010, but it has dropped slightly from a year ago. Following steep increases just before the economy began to recover, customer satisfaction is now stalling. The overall ACSI score is 75.9, compared with 76.1 in the second quarter of 2009.
“Although the near future looks promising for General Motors and Ford, at least in a competitive sense, the near term for the economy does not look bright,” said Fornell. Labor markets show no sign of improvement, financial markets are edgy and consumers are cautious at a time when more household spending would be desirable. Even though ACSI is at a high level, the trend is not upward. Increasing customer satisfaction, rising disposable income and greater consumer confidence would probably be necessary to bring about more spending.”
Among the individual auto nameplates, Ford’s Lincoln-Mercury division leads, up 1% to an ACSI score of 89, its highest ever, followed closely by GM’s Buick, unchanged at 88. Behind Lincoln and Buick are BMW (−1%), Mercedes-Benz (unchanged) and Cadillac (−3%), all tied at 86, followed by Toyota’s recall-plagued Lexus division, down 5% to 85. At the other end of the spectrum, Chrysler’s brands drop below the industry average, with the Chrysler division down 5% to 80, Dodge down 4% to 78 and Jeep at the bottom, falling 3% to 77.
A year ago amid the global recession, both discounting and the government’s “Cash for Clunkers” program helped many brands reach their highest satisfaction levels ever as a smaller customer base saw an increase in value for money, but this has not been sustainable across the industry. Several automakers retreat from all-time highs set in 2009: Honda (−5% to 84), Hyundai (−4% to 82), Volkswagen (−6% to 81) and Chevrolet (−4% to 80) all drop sharply this year. The same goes for Cadillac, Lexus, Chrysler and Dodge—all declining from record-high scores last year.
Overall, 14 of the 19 largest auto nameplates show some deterioration in customer satisfaction over the past year. Of the few nameplates holding steady or improving, Nissan makes the biggest gain, up 5% to match the industry average at 82 and rebounding from a similar drop a year ago. GMC shows a smaller improvement, up 2% to 84.
Toyota’s recalls have had a bigger effect on Lexus than on the Toyota brand. The Toyota brand recalls were more visible, affecting millions of Toyota vehicles, but the Lexus recalls impacted a greater proportion of recent Lexus owners, sweeping across nearly the entire Lexus lineup for problems ranging from fuel leaks and engine stalls to rollover risks. While Lexus drops sharply, Toyota declines only half as much, falling 2% to 84.